Curiosity, with a reality check.

AI experiments.
Minus the hype.

I try new AI tools, workflows and ideas in the real world, then document what actually happened.

No breathless predictions. No “10x your life”. Just useful experiments, failures, surprises — and occasionally something worth paying for.

See what I’m experimenting with

What is INTGOM?

INTGOM stands for I Need To Get Out More. It started as a reminder to step away from the keyboard and spend more time doing other things.

I’m John Cairney, a former enterprise CTO. Retirement was supposed to help with that. Instead, it’s given me more freedom to experiment with technology, and I keep finding reasons to sit back down. So far, the name is proving more successful than the plan.

INTGOM is where I explore AI by actually using it: building things, testing workflows, comparing approaches and occasionally trying to turn an idea into a few quid.

Some experiments work. Some are pointless. Some expose just how far the technology still has to go.

I’m interested in all three.

The current rabbit holes

What I’m experimenting with

Building with AI

Can current AI tools actually build useful websites, apps, automations and digital products — without quietly creating more work than they save?

AI as a creator

I’m testing what happens when AI meets writing, images, video and online marketplaces — including whether any of it attracts a real audience or earns actual money.

Living with AI

Beyond demos and benchmarks, where does AI genuinely make everyday work and life better? And where is an ordinary tool still the better answer?

Selected writing

Who’s behind this?

I’m John Cairney. I spent most of my career working in technology and finished it as CTO of a large utility.

I retired in 2026, which gives me the useful combination of decades of technology experience and no particular need to pretend every new AI product is revolutionary.

INTGOM is where I indulge the curiosity.

For professional advisory work, there’s Cairney Advisory

Say hello

Something worth trying, a useful observation or a different take?

hello@intgom.com